Legal Opinion
Garvin v. Timber Cutters, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 2, 1983No. 16-80-07328; CA A24907PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*499WARDEN, J.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover wages from his former employer under ORS 652.140(2).1 He was granted partial summary judgment for the amount of wages due, but the issues of liability for penalties under ORS 652.1502 and for attorney fees under ORS 652.200(2)3 were reserved for trial. In a jury trial, plaintiffs motion for a directed verdict was denied. The jury found for defendant, and plaintiff appeals from the denial of his motion for a directed verdict.4 We reverse.
Defendant is a logging joint venture made up of two corporations, Timber Cutters, Inc., and L. V. Dzankich…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sabin v. Willamette-Western CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- All-States Leasing Co. v. Pacific Empire Land Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
3Cited by12 opinions
- Wilson v. Smurfit Newsprint Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Kling v. Exxon Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Nash v. Resources, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 1997
- Duncan v. Office DepotDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1997
- Reed v. Curry-Kropp-Cates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.