Legal Opinion
Nash v. Resources, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided September 19, 1997No. Civil 96-1653-REPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REDDEN, District Judge:
This is an action by Marcus Nash against defendants Resources, Incorporated (“Resources”) and Pat Greenman, asserting claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 207 and 215(a)(3) (“FLSA”) for unpaid overtime wages and retaliation; Or. Rev.Stat. § 652.610 for failure to itemize wage deductions; Or.Rev.Stat. § 652.140 for failure to pay all wages due upon termination; and wrongful discharge. Plaintiff seeks reinstatement, unpaid wages, liquidated damages, civil penalties, and punitive damages.
Nash moves for summary judgment on 1) defendants’ liability…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Huang v. Gateway Hotel HoldingsDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2007
- Stop & Shoppe Mart, Inc. v. MehdiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Fuentes v. CAI International, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2010
- Mathis v. Housing Authority of Umatilla CountyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2002
- White v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.