Legal Opinion

Lindstrom v. McMillan

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1917No. 14130PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for What-com county, Hardin, J., entered December 23, 1916, iipon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action to enjoin the collection of an assessment for a permanent highway improvement, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This, action was brought for the purpose of having declared' void, and restraining the collection of, a local assessment for a permanent highway improvement. After the issues were framed, the cause was tried to the court *609without a jury, and resulted in findings and conclusions of law and judgment supporting the position of the plaintiffs. From this judgment, the defendants appeal.

The facts which present the questions involved may be stated as follows: The location of the permanent improvement was in Whatcom county, and was on the road connect-

*610ing Bellingham and Ferndale. The improvement began…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Collins v. City of EllensburgWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Gerlach v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Redding v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Johnson v. City of DaytonWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  2. In Re the Assessment for the Establishment of Roeder AvenueWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Kaufman v. McMillanWashington Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API