Legal Opinion
Miller v. S.T. Good Insurance
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 30, 1997No. Civil Action 96-4172Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BARTLE, District Judge.
This diversity case emanates from a fire which totally destroyed the Falmouth Playhouse in Falmouth, Massachusetts.
Plaintiffs Ralph Miller (“Miller”) and Jade Curtain, Ltd. (“Jade”), the owners of the Falmouth Playhouse, as well as the Bucks County Playhouse and the Pocono Playhouse in Pennsylvania, instituted this diversity action against their insurance agent, S.T. Good Insurance, Inc. (“S.T. Good”). The defendant has now moved for judgment on the pleadings under Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or, in the alternative, for summary judgment…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Allan J. Jablonski v. Pan American World Airways, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Dona W. Horowitz, Individually and as Co-Executrix of the Estate of Leonard N. Horowitz, Deceased Alfred Camner, Co-Executor of the Estate of Leonard N. Horowitz, Deceased v. Federal Kemper Life Assurance Company, in No. 94-1900. Dona W. Horowitz, Individually and as Co-Executrix of the Estate of Leonard N. Horowitz, Deceased Alfred Camner, Co-Executor of the Estate of Leonard N. Horowitz, Deceased, in No. 94-1901 v. Federal Kemper Life Assurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.