Legal Opinion

B.F. Goodrich Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided January 27, 1994No. Court No. 90-05-00228PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Background

Musgrave, Judge:

November 3,1992, counsel for Customs submitted a letter to which was attached a General Notice published in Customs Bulletin & Decisions, Vol. 26, No. 43 (October 21 1992) describing the steps Customs has taken to comply with this Court’s judgment. Plaintiff was refunded its drawback claims but asserts that Customs did not comply with the Court’s judgment. See B.F Goodrich Co. v. United States, 16 CIT 333, Slip Op. 92-68 (May 12, 1992), as amended, Slip Op. 92-87, (June 9, 1992) (Collectively, “B.F. Goodrich I”) (holding that Customs could not require…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Central Soya Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1991
  3. Central Soya Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
  2. United States Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
  3. Transpacific Steel LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
  4. Transpacific Steel LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
  5. United States v. Koehler Oberkirch GmbHUnited States Court of International Trade · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API