B.F. Goodrich Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Background
Musgrave, Judge:
November 3,1992, counsel for Customs submitted a letter to which was attached a General Notice published in Customs Bulletin & Decisions, Vol. 26, No. 43 (October 21 1992) describing the steps Customs has taken to comply with this Court’s judgment. Plaintiff was refunded its drawback claims but asserts that Customs did not comply with the Court’s judgment. See B.F Goodrich Co. v. United States, 16 CIT 333, Slip Op. 92-68 (May 12, 1992), as amended, Slip Op. 92-87, (June 9, 1992) (Collectively, “B.F. Goodrich I”) (holding that Customs could not require…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Central Soya Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1991
- Central Soya Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- United States Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- Transpacific Steel LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
- Transpacific Steel LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
- United States v. Koehler Oberkirch GmbHUnited States Court of International Trade · 2026