Legal Opinion

Estes Lumber Co. v. Investors' Syndicate

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 8, 1931No. 6 Div. 873PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

Appellant filed this bill against S. M. Casey, as owner of the property, and Investors’ Syndicate, a corporation, holding a mortgage thereon, to enforce a materialman’s lien and have its superiority declared over the mortgage of the Investors’ Syndicate. Defendant Casey offered no defense, nor did one Bond, also made a party defendant. The Investors’ Syndiéate offered two defenses: First, that the suit was barred by the statute of limitations ; and, second, that complainant was es-topped to claim otherwise. Upon consideration of the cause for final decree on pleadings and proof, the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. King v. Livingston Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  3. Green v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Brown v. FrenchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  5. Gilbert v. Talladega Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Frank Nelson, Jr. And Lee Etta Nelson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
  2. Bromberg v. First Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  3. Wright v. FanninSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  4. Nelson Weaver Mortgage Co. v. Dover Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  5. First National Bank v. Royal MarcherNew York Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API