Legal Opinion

Broadwater v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 27, 2006No. 0215, September Term, 2005PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoylan, J.

Ironically, it is immeasurably easier to waive a fundamental protection of the United States Constitution than it is to waive a provision of the Maryland Rules. The latter, after all, are “precise rubrics.. that are to be read and followed,” Isen v. Phoenix Assurance Co., 259 Md. 564, 570, 270 A.2d 476 (1970), whereas the former are but the “majestic ambiguities” 1 written for the ages. An especially intimidating specimen of those “precise rubrics” are the three densely packed pages of Maryland Rule 4-215, dealing with the waiver of the right to counsel. They are stern directives far more…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Maryland v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Parren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  3. Isen v. Phoenix Assurance Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  4. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  5. Moten v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Broadwater v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Nodeen v. SigurdssonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  3. Jones v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  4. Broadwater v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. Randolph v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API