Legal Opinion

Moten v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 23, 1995No. 95PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAKER, Judge.

This case presents the question of whether a trial court’s failure to advise a defendant who wishes to waive counsel of allowable penalties, as required by Maryland Rule 4-215, can be harmless error. We shall answer in the negative.

I

Petitioner Thomas Reginald Moten, a/k/a Thomas Reginald Martinez, was indicted on charges of cocaine distribution, in violation of Maryland Code (1957, 1992 Repl. Vol., 1994 Cum. Supp.) Article 27, § 286(a)(1)1; cocaine possession, in violation of Article 27, § 287; and conspiracy to distribute cocaine, in violation of Article 27, § 290.

When Moten…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Parren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. Holman v. Kelly Catering, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. Moten v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  2. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  4. Broadwater v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. Pinkney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API