Moten v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
RAKER, Judge.
This case presents the question of whether a trial court’s failure to advise a defendant who wishes to waive counsel of allowable penalties, as required by Maryland Rule 4-215, can be harmless error. We shall answer in the negative.
I
Petitioner Thomas Reginald Moten, a/k/a Thomas Reginald Martinez, was indicted on charges of cocaine distribution, in violation of Maryland Code (1957, 1992 Repl. Vol., 1994 Cum. Supp.) Article 27, § 286(a)(1)1; cocaine possession, in violation of Article 27, § 287; and conspiracy to distribute cocaine, in violation of Article 27, § 290.
When Moten…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Parren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Holman v. Kelly Catering, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Moten v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
3Cited by38 opinions
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Broadwater v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Pinkney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.