Krumholz v. Rusak
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Losing, Chief Justice.
Action for damages for the violation of an alleged contract. The jury returned a verdict of $870 in favor of plaintiffs. Defendant appeals from the order denying her alternative motion for judgment or a new trial. We consider only the portion of the order denying a new trial, since defendant was not entitled to move for judgment notwithstanding the verdict because of her failure to make a motion for a directed verdict at the close of the evidence. M. g. A. 605.06 and cases cited in the notes; 3 Dunnell, Dig. & gupp. § 5079.
Plaintiffs rely on a contract entered into…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Carlson v. FredsallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Welsh v. Estate of WelshSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hydranautics v. FilmTec Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2003
- Nelson v. Austin Transit, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965