Legal Opinion

Krumholz v. Rusak

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 3, 1950No. 35,022PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Losing, Chief Justice.

Action for damages for the violation of an alleged contract. The jury returned a verdict of $870 in favor of plaintiffs. Defendant appeals from the order denying her alternative motion for judgment or a new trial. We consider only the portion of the order denying a new trial, since defendant was not entitled to move for judgment notwithstanding the verdict because of her failure to make a motion for a directed verdict at the close of the evidence. M. g. A. 605.06 and cases cited in the notes; 3 Dunnell, Dig. & gupp. § 5079.

Plaintiffs rely on a contract entered into…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carlson v. FredsallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  2. Welsh v. Estate of WelshSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hydranautics v. FilmTec Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2003
  2. Nelson v. Austin Transit, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API