Legal Opinion

In Re James Randall Smith and Bonnie Jo Smith, Debtors. James Randall Smith and Bonnie Jo Smith v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 19, 1990No. 89-2936WMPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

This case arises under § 505(a) of the Bankruptcy Code of 1978, 11 U.S.C. § 505(a). Purporting to exercise jurisdiction under that section, the Bankruptcy Court decided that the debtors, James Randall Smith and Bonnie Jo Smith, did not owe a certain tax penalty. The Bankruptcy Court further held that the government was in possession of some $16,400.00 that rightfully belonged to the debtors. The District Court affirmed, and the government filed this appeal. The government now argues that the case is moot, and that the appeal should therefore be dismissed. For reasons…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. North Carolina v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Smith v. United States (In Re Smith)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1986

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
  2. Werlein v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1992
  3. Scott Rivera v. Bank of America, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  4. 1819 Ltd. v. Florida Department of Revenue (In Re Inn on the Bay, Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1993
  5. Brent Electric Company v. International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API