Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. McLaughlin

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1935No. Nos. 22532, 22533. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilson

Two actions of debt were brought in the name of the People of the State of Illinois by the Director of Agriculture on behalf of various shippers against the G. H. Cross Company and the defendant the Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, in the municipal court of Chicago, for the recovery on two bonds given by the parties named, as principal and surety, to the People of the State of Illinois in the sum of $5000. The two cases were consolidated and heard on an agreed statement of facts. Judgment was rendered for the Director of Agriculture. The surety has appealed to this court.

The statement…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Savage v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Patsone v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rosewood Corp. v. Transamerica InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Gadlin v. Auditor of Public AccountsIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Illinois Ex Rel. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Chicagoland Agencies, Inc. v. PalmerIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Chicago Housing Authority v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API