Hoegh v. Miller

*558, T „„ piling1 and avoiding statute, *557— I. The record is this: The original petition alleged the speaking of certain slanderous words to have *558been done about the 15th of March, 1916. Demurrer asserting the statute of limitations was sustained, and we may a^sume that, as the pleading then stood, the demurrer was rightly sustained. Later, an amended and substituted petition was filed, which made no change in the original, except that, instead of charging the slander to have been uttered about the 15th of March, 1916, it was now pleaded that said words were spoken in October, 1916, and at various…