Legal Opinion
Cimijotti v. Paulsen
District Court, N.D. Iowa
Decided June 3, 1964No. Civ. 912PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANSON, District Judge.
This is a ruling on a motion by defendants to dismiss or for summary judgment. The plaintiff alleges that his former wife, Lauretta M. Cimijotti, and two other women, Frances Paulsen and Clarice Sprout, conspired to damage his person, reputation, and property.
The defendants have moved for summary judgment for the following reasons: (1) that conspiracy alone is not actionable in Iowa unless something is done which without the conspiracy would give rise to a cause of action and that no actionable cause has been alleged; (2) that the statute of limitations has run on any…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Des Moines Bank & Trust Co. v. George M. Bechtel & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1952
- Northern Kentucky Telephone Co. v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
- Park-In Theatres, Inc. v. Paramount-Richards Theatres Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1950
- Marshall G. Doza and Mary E. Doza v. American National Insurance Company, an Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
- Heacock v. HeacockSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Bryce v. Episcopal Church in the Diocese of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Auld v. Mobay Chemical CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
- Scott v. HammockUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- Church of Scientology of Cal. v. SiegelmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- Jennison, Raymond v. Prasifka, Jeanette, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.