Loeschigk v. . Bridge
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from a judgment entered upon the decision of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial district, affirming the judgment dismissing the complaint, with costs, rendered on trial before Mr. Justice Leonard without a jury.
Read the full summary
Appeal from a judgment entered upon the decision of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial district, affirming the judgment dismissing the complaint, with costs, rendered on trial before Mr. Justice Leonard without a jury. The appellants, having recovered judgment against the respondent Bridge, July 13, 1861, for $3,501.39, upon which execution was returned unsatisfied, brought this action to set aside a sale made by Bridge to Burdick, and certain judgments recovered against Bridge by Burdick, as fraudulent. On the trial the justice found as follows: “ That the plaintiffs…
1Opinion of the CourtLott, J.
The findings of fact by the judge at Special Term, having been affirmed on appeal by the General Term, are conclusive on tiffs court. They show that the sale by the defendant, Bridge, of his stock of goods, bills receivable and accounts, to his co-defendant, Burdick, was made for a good and valuable consideration, and without any intent to hinder, delay or defraud the creditors of Bridge.
The referee, it is true, also finds that at the time of the gale Bridge was unable to payrhis debts as they matured, and that Burdick, who was his book-keeper, was aware of this fact. Those facts do not jper…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Baughman v. PennSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
- Priest v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Industrial Trust, Title & Saving Co. v. WeakleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Ruhl v. . PhillipsNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Evans v. SimsNew York Supreme Court · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.