Legal Opinion
Kaplan v. Ritter
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 17, 1987PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Titone, J.
Having been tried and convicted in Federal court of various racketeering, conspiracy and fraud counts, petitioners now seek to prohibit the New York County District Attorney from trying them on charges of larceny and securities fraud arising from the same transaction. Their appeal from the judgment below denying them such relief requires us to consider the scope and proper application of CPL 40.20 (2) (e), which establishes an exception to the general statutory rule against successive prosecutions where "[e]ach offense involves death, injury, loss or other…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- People v. DeanNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Abraham v. Justices of New York Supreme CourtNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Morgenthau v. Citisource, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. RodgersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Schmidt v. RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- City of New York v. Citisource, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Chang v. RotkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. HiltsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. VespreyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.