Dippel v. Hunt
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGHTMIRE, Presiding Judge.
Upon discovering plaintiff’s own insurance company had paid him for his burned up car, the trial court vacated a jury verdict awarding plaintiff the value of the car on the ground his insurance company, not he, was the “real party in interest”' — the only person or entity who could prosecute the action. Plaintiff challenges the legality of the ruling.
On a clear, crisp December day in 1970 defendant, Grace Hunt, set out to burn weeds and thistles inhabiting the wide, shallow, gently sloping highway right-of-way or bar ditch which adjoined her farmland along a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- DENCO BUS LINES, INC. v. HargisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co. v. ShuttSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Huey v. StephensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Harrington v. Central States Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Great Western Motor Lines, Inc. v. CozardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Schwartz v. HastyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2005
- Murphy Oil USA Inc v. Trivental IncCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Weatherly v. FlournoyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996
- Jack's Service of the United States, Inc. v. Sav-A-Stop, Inc. (In Re Sav-A-Stop, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1989
- Murphy Oil USA Inc v. Trivental IncCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.