Legal Opinion

Dippel v. Hunt

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided December 6, 1973No. 46101PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRIGHTMIRE, Presiding Judge.

Upon discovering plaintiff’s own insurance company had paid him for his burned up car, the trial court vacated a jury verdict awarding plaintiff the value of the car on the ground his insurance company, not he, was the “real party in interest”' — the only person or entity who could prosecute the action. Plaintiff challenges the legality of the ruling.

On a clear, crisp December day in 1970 defendant, Grace Hunt, set out to burn weeds and thistles inhabiting the wide, shallow, gently sloping highway right-of-way or bar ditch which adjoined her farmland along a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. DENCO BUS LINES, INC. v. HargisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  2. Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co. v. ShuttSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Huey v. StephensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  4. Harrington v. Central States Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Great Western Motor Lines, Inc. v. CozardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. HastyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2005
  2. Murphy Oil USA Inc v. Trivental IncCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  3. Weatherly v. FlournoyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996
  4. Jack's Service of the United States, Inc. v. Sav-A-Stop, Inc. (In Re Sav-A-Stop, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1989
  5. Murphy Oil USA Inc v. Trivental IncCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API