Legal Opinion

Toledo, Wabash, & Western Railway Co. v. Hammond

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1870PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from the Miami Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtGregory, J.

Hammond sued the railway company as a common carrier, for a trunk and the contents thereof, shipped at Toledo, Ohio, for Peru, Indiana. There was filed with the complaint a bill of particulars of the contents of the trunk. The defendant moved to strike out certain specified items therein for the alleged reason that they were not proper articles of baggage. The court overruled the motion; and this is complained of as erroneous. It is. enough to say, that there is no allegation in the complaint that the trunk and its contents were delivered to the appellant as- baggage.

The nest point made is,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Paine v. Lake Erie & Louisville RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Doyle v. KiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1855

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Childress v. Lake Erie & Western RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Snarr v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
  3. Sherman v. Pullman Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1913
  4. Hamilton v. Baggage & Omnibus Transfer Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
  5. National Bank v. Second National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API