Sachs v. Norn
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Bay; Shepard, J. Garnishment proceedings by Henry W. Sachs and Louis E. Wenzel, copartners as Sachs & Wenzel, against James Norn as garnishee defendant of the Rifle River Lumber Company. The Lumberman’s State Bank was permitted to intervene as claimant. There was judgment for defendant bank on verdict directed by the court, and plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
'Moore, C. J.
The plaintiffs are a firm doing business ¡¡at West Branch. The principal defendant was a partnership association, limited, engaged in lumber business near *358that place. The company purchased of plaintiffs between February 1 and June 6, 1902, supplies for use in its camps. Plaintiffs, failing to obtain payment, on December 6, 1902, commenced suit against the principal defendant, which resulted in a judgment against it on November 16, 1903. For the purpose of procuring a writ of garnishment against Mr. Norn in favor of the plaintiffs, Mr. Brockway, at the same time the original suit…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hebel v. Amazon InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Millard v. Lenawee Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Wattles v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Maynards v. CornwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1854
- Union National Bank v. Muskegon Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by1 opinion
- Detroit Trust Co. v. Detroit City Service Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933