Legal Opinion

Splunk Inc. v. Cribl, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 24, 2024No. 3:22-cv-07611Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 SPLUNK INC., 11 Plaintiff, No. C 22-07611 WHA 12 v. 13 CRIBL, INC., ORDER RE REMAINING CLAIMS AND DEFENSES, 14 Defendant. AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF 15 16 17 This order addresses the claims and affirmative defenses preserved by the parties and 18 tried to the bench, as well as plaintiff Splunk Inc.’s motion for a permanent injunction (Dkt. 19 Nos. 346–48). 20 1. AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES. 21 Starting with the affirmative defenses, defendant Cribl, Inc. seeks judgment in its favor 22 on account of equitable estoppel,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Shroyer v. New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. Boris Levitt v. Yelp! Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. Surprenant v. RivasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  5. Lasercomb America, Inc. v. Job Reynolds Larry Holliday, and Holiday Steel Rule Die CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API