Legal Opinion

Campbell v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided August 19, 1981No. 560-79TPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFriedman, Chief Judge

This is another chapter in the continuing saga of attempts by the Internal Revenue Service to limit the use of "flower bonds” to pay federal estate taxes. Flower bonds are United States Treasury bonds (1) that were issued a number of years ago at interest rates substantially below current ones and therefore sell significantly below par, but (2) that may be redeemed at par before maturity to pay federal estate taxes. See generally Girard Trust Bank v. United States, 221 Ct. Cl. 134, 136-37 n.1, 602 F.2d 938, 940 n.1 (1979).

In the present case, as in a number of others, the bonds were purchased…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Estate of Watson v. BlumenthalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  2. Neill v. Pure Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  3. Bennett v. RomosTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Gaston v. CopelandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  5. Estate of Pfohl v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Golleher v. HortonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  2. Cavanagh v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
  3. Stephen C. Cole and Robert Strack v. Michael McWillie, Wanda Juanita Phillips, and Delvonne Burke, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2015
  4. Papson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  5. Stephen C. Cole and Robert Strack v. Michael McWillie, Wanda Juanita Phillips, and Delvonne Burke, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API