Legal Opinion

Papson v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 18, 1982No. 602-80TPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The case is before us on defendant’s motion to adopt a trial judge’s report with modifications. Rule 54(b)(3) (iii). Plaintiff does not oppose the motion. The case was one of those rising out of defendant’s first acceptance, *744and then refusal to accept so-called "Flower Bonds” in payment of estate tax liabilities; e.g., Campbell v. United States, 228 Ct.Cl. 440, 657 F.2d 1174 (1981). Generally these bonds were purchased at a large discount on behalf of the decedent shortly before death, and tendered as payment at par. After nonsuccess in several cases, e.g., Campbell, in this and other courts,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Campbell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Estate of Hubberd v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992
  2. Cavanagh v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
  3. Estate of Hubberd v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API