Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Davis

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided November 1, 2013No. 10, 2013PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIDGELY, Justice:

This interlocutory appeal involves whether Delaware’s personal injury pro*630tection (PIP) statute1 requires insurers to reserve PIP benefits for lost wages when requested. The plaintiff suffered severe injuries as a passenger in a car accident. While he was in a coma, his mother signed for him an assignment of insurance benefits in favor of the hospital. Plaintiff has not challenged the validity of this assignment. The hospital’s claim was promptly paid by the insurance company. When the plaintiff later requested the insurers to reserve his PIP benefits for his past and future…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United Vanguard Fund, Inc. v. TakeCare, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1997
  2. Arnold v. Society for Sayings Bancorp, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1996
  3. In Re the Adoption of SwansonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  4. Wemyss v. ColemanKentucky Supreme Court · 1987
  5. General Motors Corp. v. New Castle CountySupreme Court of Delaware · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hecksher v. Fairwinds Baptist Church, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2015
  2. Clark v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
  3. Dabaldo v. URS Energy & ConstructionSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
  4. Albertson v. BAC Home Loan ServicingSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
  5. B/E Aerospace, Inc. v. J.A. Reinhardt Holdings, LLCSuperior Court of Delaware · 2020

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API