Godfrey v. Union County Board of Commissioners
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
By its three assignments of error and two arguments, defendant challenges Judge Kivett’s finding of fact number five and his single conclusion of law.
While we perceive that Judge Kivett’s finding of fact number five may be more in the nature of a conclusion, we need not dwell on that aspect of his order. There is no dispute as to the underlying evidence in this case or the facts established by that evidence. The only controversy involves the legal significance of the evidence and the facts. See, e.g., Lathan v. Board of Commissioners, 47 N.C. App. 357, 267 S.E. 2d 30, disc. rev.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Blades v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Lathan v. Union County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
3Cited by7 opinions
- Godfrey v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of Union CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Alderman v. Chatham CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Chrismon v. Guilford CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Godfrey v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Godfrey v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of Union CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.