Legal Opinion

Harkleroad v. Linkous

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 13, 2011No. 092299PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

704 S.E.2d 381 (2011)

Shannon HARKLEROAD, et al.

v.

Theodore K. LINKOUS, et al.

Record No. 092299.

Supreme Court of Virginia.

January 13, 2011.

Randall C. Eads (Randall A. Eads, on brief), for appellants.

David L. Harmon, for appellees.

Present: All the Justices.

Opinion by Justice LAWRENCE L. KOONTZ, JR.

In this appeal, we consider whether the circuit court correctly determined that a co-tenant with an undivided one-half interest in an improved parcel of real property had established the necessary elements to prove adverse possession as against the other co-tenants and, thus, was entitled to a judgment…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Grappo v. BlanksSupreme Court of Virginia · 1991
  2. Stonestreet v. DoyleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1881
  3. Matthews v. W. T. Freeman Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1950
  4. Trailsend Land Co. v. Virginia Holding Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  5. Helms v. ManspileSupreme Court of Virginia · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Scott v. BURWELL'S BAY IMP. ASS'NSupreme Court of Virginia · 2011
  2. Antero Resources Corporation v. Elwanda J. Pike, in her capacity as representative of the Estate of Rufus Fordyce Pike, John Kent Pike, Jr., Daniel Edward Pike, James P. Moffitt, Tanya L. Yoho, Ted Arthur McCullough, Robert A. Borchers, Ritchie Petroleum Corporation, AMP Fund III, LP, and Diversified Production LLC, successor in interest to Alliance Petroleum Co. LLCIntermediate Court of Appeals of West Virginia · 2025
  3. Pui Ho v. Ebne RahmanCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API