Legal Opinion

Simmons v. Yurchak

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided March 15, 1990No. 88-P-950PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.

On special questions, a jury returned a verdict that the defendant Yurchak, a physician, had not been negligent in treating the plaintiff Stanley G. Simmons. We discuss some evidentiary issues which the plaintiff has raised and then comment in comparatively abbreviated fashion on the residual appellate points.

On November 17, 1978, Simmons, then age sixty-nine, suffered a stroke and was admitted to Massachusetts General Hospital. As a consequence of the stroke, Simmons is no longer able to work, he has trouble walking, and his field of vision is limited. During four weeks preceding the stroke,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Simon v. SolomonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. WeloskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  3. Brune v. BelinkoffMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  4. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  5. Letch v. DanielsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Flood v. Southland Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  2. Clark v. RoweMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  3. Loven v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1992
  4. Costantino v. David M. Herzog, M.D., P.C.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  5. Elias v. SuranMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API