Legal Opinion

George A. Hudspeth and Wife, Vona Lee Hudspeth v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 19, 1975No. 75-2492PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Taxpayers deducted a decrease in their cotton allotment as a business loss in 1971. The deduction was disallowed, and taxpayers sued in district court for a refund. Summary judgment was granted in favor of the United States on the basis that there was no closed transaction giving rise to a deductible business loss. We affirm.

In the years 1968 through 1970, the taxpayers bought cotton acreage allotments (under the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, 7 U.S.C. § 1281 et seq.) totaling 145.3 acres. In 1971 the national cotton allotment was reduced. The allocation of this reduction resulted in a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Allegheny-Ludlum Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  2. S. B. Allen v. W. Lewis DavidCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Joe Willie ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  2. Texas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. Kim Edward MinisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  4. Parker Plaza West Partners, a Texas General Partnership v. Unum Pension and Insurance Company, F/k/a Union Mutual Pension and Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  5. First Victoria National Bank, Independent Under the Will of T. J. Babb, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API