Legal Opinion
B&P Littleford, LLC v. Prescott Machine, LLC and Ray Miller
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided April 28, 2026No. 1:25-cv-13348Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION B&P LITTLEFORD, LLC, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Case No. 25-cv-13348 v. Honorable Robert J. White PRESCOTT MACHINE, LLC, and RAY MILLER Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF/COUNTERDEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (ECF Nos. 26; 27) Plaintiff B&P Littleford (B&P) designs and builds industrial equipment and produces technical drawings of the product designs to preserve their work product. B&P safeguards these technical drawings with copyright protections and nondisclosure…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation EnterprisesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Philip D. Overstreet v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Certified Restoration Dry Cleaning Network, L.L.C. v. Tenke Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.