Legal Opinion

Rayfield v. Homart Development Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 19, 1981No. 79-2074PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE RIZZI

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a Structural Work Act case (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 48, par. 60 et seq.) in which plaintiff, Eugene Kenneth Rayfield, was injured while operating a Traxcavator at a construction site owned by defendants Homart Development Co. and Broadway-Hale Properties, Inc. The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of defendants. We affirm.

A Traxcavator is basically a tractor with a front bucket that is used to scoop and lift material such as gravel or stone. The bucket tilts and is lifted by means of hydraulic arms controlled…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Grasse v. Dealer's Transport Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Schultz v. Henry Ericsson Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Crafton v. Lester B. Knight & Associates, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Matthews v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  5. Kenworthy v. YoungAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. American Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago v. NAT. ADVERTISING CO.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Prange v. Kamar Construction Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  3. Meyer v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  4. St. John v. City of NapervilleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  5. Cooley v. Central Illinois Public Service Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API