Legal Opinion
Law v. Barnhart
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 10, 2006No. 04 Civ. 7761(MBM)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MUKASEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Sherdic Law challenges the Commissioner of Social Security’s determination that he was not entitled to Social Security Income disability benefits (“SSI”), because he was not disabled. Law seeks review of the Social Security Administration’s (“SSA”) decision pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2000). Defendant Jo Anne Barnhart has moved for a judgment on the pleadings under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c); Law has cross-moved for a judgment on the pleadings. For the reasons set forth below, the SSA’s decision is vacated and the case is remanded for further…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Elmer G. Berry v. Richard Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- George MONGEUR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Patrick Balsamo v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Helene Marcus v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Miller v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024
- Snoddy v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2022