Legal Opinion
In Re the Baan Co. Securities Litigation
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 21, 2000No. Civil Action 98-2465 (JHG)(JMF)PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JOYCE HENS GREEN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs’ amended consolidated complaint, filed April 22, 1999, alleges securities fraud against Baan Company, N.V. (Baan) and several of its officers and directors. Baan is a Netherlands corporation with offices in the Netherlands and Reston, Virginia. The uncertified class consists of individuals who bought Baan securities (including common stock, ADRs, warrants, and options) between January 28, 1997, and October 12, 1998. These purchases were made on the NASDAQ National Market, the Amsterdam stock exchange, and the Frankfurt…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- City Of Monroe Employees Retirement System v. Bridgestone CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- In Re MicroStrategy, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000
- In Re Enron Corp. Sec., Derivative & ERISA Lit.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2003
- New Mexico State Investment Council v. Ernst & Young LLPCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- In Re: Ikon Office Solutions, Inc., Securities Litigation City of Philadelphia, Through Its Board of Pensions and Retirement, Oliver Scofield and Lawrence Porter, as Representatives of a Certified Class ConsistingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.