Legal Opinion

Ortega v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided August 31, 1993No. 01-91-00235-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HEDGES, Justice.

The trial court found appellant, Juan Domingo Ortega, guilty of possession of cocaine, a controlled substance, in an amount less than 28 grams. Finding the enhancement paragraph true, the court assessed punishment at 12-years confinement. We affirm.

In his first point of error, appellant asserts the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress because the cocaine was seized after a pretext traffic stop. Appellant urges that the pretext arrest violated his rights afforded by the fourth amendment of the United States Constitution.

At a suppression hearing, the trial…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. Maddox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. Daniels v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Armitage v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Klare v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
  2. Magic v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994
  3. Employees Retirement System of Texas v. Cash, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995
  4. Employees Retirement System of Texas Blue Cross and Blue Shield And Group Life & Health Insurance Company, Inc. v. Selena D. Cash, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995
  5. James Spence v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API