Daniels v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
CLINTON, Judge.
After his motion to suppress evidence was denied, appellant pled not guilty and was tried before the trial court. Appellant and the State entered into a stipulation of evidence on the basis of which appellant was found guilty of possession of a controlled substance and sentenced to five years imprisonment in the Texas Department of Corrections. His conviction was affirmed by the court of appeals. Daniels v. State, 681 S.W.2d 78 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th] 1984).
Appellant objected to the admission of evidence seized from him…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by152 opinions
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Livingston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Hoag v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Gilbert v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994
147 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.