Legal Opinion

Wamboldt v. . Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 27, 1926PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In 1915 defendant issued to plaintiff two policies of insurance, in accordance with applications therefor, one dated 1 June, the other 29 October. Both policies were on the ordinary life, double indemnity and total disability plan. By each policy, defendant promised and agreed to pay to Alice May Wamboldt, wife of plaintiff, at his death, subject to the terms and conditions set out therein, the sum of $5,000. To each policy were attached riders, forming a part thereof, providing, upon certain contingencies, for double indemnity and total disability. Each policy contained a clause, in words as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Insurance v. Hurni Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Massachusetts Benefit Life Ass'n v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. American Trust Co. v. Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  4. Indiana National Life Insurance v. McGinnisIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Hardy v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Misskelley v. Home Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  2. Millis v. Continental Life Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
  3. New York Life Insurance Company v. DandridgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  4. Mills v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. Ambrose v. Acacia Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API