Legal Opinion

Shurtz v. Schoolcraft & Three Rivers Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1861PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to St. Joseph Circuit. Tbe case is sufficiently stated in tbe opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Campbell J.:

Defendant was sued upon a subscription to tbe stock of plaintiffs, made December 18, 1855. It appears from tbe finding, that tbe company bad been previously organized, by an original subscription and filing of articles under tbe General Railroad Law, and that five commissioners were named in tbe articles to open books for further subscriptions under the statute. Tbe amount of capital stock, *271fixed by the articles of agreement, was $180,000, divided into 5200 shares of $25 each. The directors, by vote June 14, 1855 (which was during the same month when the organization took place),…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Walker v. DevereauxNew York Court of Chancery · 1833

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Livesey v. Omaha Hotel Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Hendrix v. Academy of MusicSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  3. International Fair & Exposition Ass'n v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Peninsula Leasing Co. v. CodyMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Preston National Bank v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API