Legal Opinion
Slovik v. Yates
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 10, 2009No. 06-55867PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION
ORDER
The Opinion filed October 6, 2008, slip op. 14145, and appearing at 545 F.3d 1181 (9th Cir.2008), is hereby amended. The amended opinion is filed concurrently with this Order.
With these amendments, the panel judges have voted to deny Appellee’s petition for rehearing. Judges Kleinfeld and Bybee voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Canby recommended denying the petition for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Littlejohn v. TrammellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Jones v. CainCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- Adilao Ortiz v. James YatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Ocampo v. VailCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Reynaldo Ayala v. Kevin ChappellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.