Legal Opinion · Concurrence

National Ass'n of Manufacturers v. National Labor Relations Board

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 7, 2013No. 12-5068, 12-5138Published

1Concurrence

KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON, with whom Circuit Judge BROWN joins,

concurring:

I fully agree with Judge Randolph’s analysis of NLRA section 8(c) and wholeheartedly concur in his well-reasoned opinion. See 29 U.S.C. § 158(c). Judge Brown and I would also hold, however, *966that the Board is without authority to promulgate the posting rule under NLRA section 6 as well—the issue Judge Randolph does not reach in light of his reliance on section 8(e). Section 6 provides: “The Board shall have authority from time to time to make, amend, and rescind, in the manner prescribed by subchapter II of chapter 5 of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. MacKay Radio & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Sure-Tan, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Republic Steel Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. American Hospital Ass'n v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API