Legal Opinion

Albert v. Haeberly

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 26, 1905PublishedCited by 7 opinions

On appeal from a decree in chancery.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gummere, Chief-Justice.

The complainant, Mrs. Albert, seeks by her bill in this case to have set aside, and decreed to be null and void, so far as she is concerned, a deed of conveyance made by her and her sister, one of the defendants in the litigation, to the defendant Emily B. R, Haeberly, on the 1st day of December, 1902, for a plot of land in the city of Scranton, Pennsylvania. The decree of the court of chancery was in favor of the complainant.

Mrs. Haeberly is the stepmother of the complainant, having married the latter’s father, William Eobinson,…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re FulperNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1926
  2. Campana v. AngeliniNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
  3. Christian v. CanfieldNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
  4. Alpaugh v. AlpaughNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944
  5. Brettenheimer v. BrettenheimerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API