Legal Opinion
Alpaugh v. Alpaugh
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided June 13, 1944No. Docket 149/484PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
My conception of the facts as disclosed by the evidence in this cause renders needless an exposition of the equitable principles enunciated by our courts in Haydock v. Haydock, 34 N.J. Eq. 570; Mott v. Mott, 49 N.J. Eq. 192;22 Atl. Rep. 997; Hall v. Otterson, 52 N.J. Eq. 522; 28 Atl. Rep. 907;affirmed, 53 N.J. Eq. 695; 35 Atl. Rep. 1130; Collins v.Collins, 63 N.J. Eq. 602; 52 Atl. Rep. 1115; Thorp v. Smith,65 N.J. Eq. 400; 54 Atl. Rep. 412; affirming, 63 N.J. Eq. 70;51 Atl. Rep. 437; Slack v. Rees, 66 N.J. Eq. 447;59 Atl. Rep. 466; Albert v. Haeberly, 68 N.J. Eq. 664; 61 Atl. Rep. 380;Post v.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Slack v. ReesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1904
- Post v. HaganSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1907
- In Re FulperNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1926
- Soper v. CiscoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915
- Hall v. OttersonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1894
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Blake v. BrennanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948
- Kerlin v. MaherNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
- Eisenberg v. FinstonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Westcott v. KonstantynowiczNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
- Zaveski v. KishNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946