Legal Opinion

Frasure v. Martin

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 7, 1952PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLAY, Commissioner.

This controversy involves the apportionment of rent, realized from a house and lot, between the widow and heirs of one-deceased. Appellant’s husband died intestate in 1933, and since that date she has. had control of and rented to others residence property owned by him. The heirs have called on her to account. The Chancellor allowed her- one-third of the net amount realized.

On this appeal she contends: (1) she was entitled to one-third of the gross rent; and (2) the heirs must reimburse her for the taxes she paid and the expenses she-incurred in the maintenance of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Morton's Exrs. v. Morton's Exr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
  2. Wyly v. KallenbachCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  3. Rich v. RichCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1869

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Martin v. FrasureCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
  2. Johnson v. DucobuCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1952
  3. Reynolds v. McGuireCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API