Legal Opinion
United States v. Albert
United States Circuit Court for the Northern District of Florida
Decided February 17, 1891PublishedCited by 4 opinions
At Law. Indictment for forgery. On motion for new trial,
1Opinion of the CourtPardee, J.
The defendant was tried and convicted under an indictment of which the following is a copy of the material portion:
*553“Did then and there willfully, knowingly, and fraudulently utter and publish as true a certain false, forged, and altered United ¡States treasury warrant, with intent thereby to defraud the United States,.he, the said J. W. Albert, then and there knowing the same to be false and forged and altered, which said treasury warrant, with the indorsements thereon, except the printed notice and other parts which are mutilated, and to the grand jurors unintelligible, is in the words and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. BarneyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1866
- United States v. LawrenceU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1875
3Cited by4 opinions
- Prussian v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- James Colby Danielson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Hamil v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1924
- United States v. WintersDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1925