Legal Opinion
Goose Pond AG, Inc. v. Duarte Nursery Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided October 13, 2020No. 2:19-cv-02631Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GOOSE POND AG, INC., No. 2:19-cv-02631-KJM-DB 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 DUARTE NURSERY, INC. et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Defendants Duarte Nursery, Inc., James Duarte and John Duarte (collectively, the 18 “Duarte parties” or “Duarte”) move to dismiss plaintiff Goose Pond Ag, Inc.’s (“Goose Pond”) 19 complaint for failure to join an indispensable party. Mot., ECF No. 18. Plaintiff opposes the 20 motion. Opp’n, ECF No. 20. Defendants replied. Reply, ECF No. 27. The court submitted the 21 motion…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Makah Indian Tribe v. C. William VerityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Takeda v. Northwestern National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Southwest Administrators, Inc. v. Rozay's Transfer, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.