Legal Opinion

American Breast Care, L.P. v. Coloplast Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided December 12, 2006No. 05-15049Unpublished

1Per curiam

Coloplast Corp. (“Coloplast”) appeals from a final judgment of the district court granting summary judgment in favor of defendants American Breast Care, L.P. and Jolly Rechenberg (collectively, “ABC”) on Coloplast’s tortious interference and Lanham Act claims. After careful review, we affirm. 1

Coloplast claims that ABC tortiously interfered with various employment contracts when it recruited certain Coloplast employees to leave their jobs and join ABC. In order to establish a claim for tortious interference under Georgia law, “whether asserting interference with contractual relations,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roger Whatley, Sr. v. Cna Insurance Companies, Baker Brothers, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  2. Disaster Services, Inc. v. ERC PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Architectural Manufacturing Co. v. Airotec, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  4. Sommers Co. v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API