Garza v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NYE, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from a murder conviction. Appellant admitted to shooting the deceased; however he asserted that the shooting was justified because it was done in the defense of a third party. Appellant was found guilty by a jury and punishment was assessed by the trial court at twenty-five years confinement. We affirm.
In his first, fourteenth, eighteenth, twenty-seventh and twenty-eighth grounds of error, appellant asserts fundamental error. Recently, in Almanza v. State, 686 S.W.2d 157 (Tex.Crim.App.1984), opinion on State’s motion for rehearing, the Court of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Ingham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Blott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Bradley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wallace v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986