Legal Opinion

Getty Refining & Marketing Co. v. Mt Fadi B

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 11, 1985No. 84-1567PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ALDISERT, Chief Judge.

This appeal by Getty Refining and Marketing Company from judgment entered in *830favor of M/T FADI B and Fadi Shipping Corp. requires us to decide whether, in the absence of physical damage, appellant may recover economic loss sustained when it had to pay contractual obligations to third parties by reason of the negligence of the FADI B. The district court applied the teachings of Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. Flint, 275 U.S. 303, 48 S.Ct. 134, 72 L.Ed. 290 (1927), and held that economic loss could not be recovered if the tortious interference with a…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Universal Minerals, Inc. v. C. A. Hughes & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  4. Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. FlintSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Louisiana ex rel. Guste v. M/V TestbankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re One Meridian Plaza Fire LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. In Re Glacier BayDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1990
  3. In Re the Exxon ValdezDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1991
  4. Getty Refining And Marketing Company v. Mt Fadi BCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  5. In Re the Complaint of Ballard Shipping Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API