Legal Opinion

Burnsville Turnpike Co. v. State ex rel. McCalla

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1889No. 13,391PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Erom the Bartholomew Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Mitchell, J. —

This was an application by the relator, McCalla, for an alternative writ of mandate to compel the appellant turnpike company, by its officers, who are made parties, to transfer four shares of the capital stock of the company, upon its books, to the relator. The case was put at issue and trial by the court, in the first instance, — the relator having demanded a jury — and a finding and judgment in favor of the company entered. This judgment was reversed upon appeal to this court, on the ground that the case was triable as a civil action at common law, and that the court below had…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Weyer v. Second National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. State ex rel. Koons v. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Green Mount & State Line Turnpike Co. v. BullaIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Koons v. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. State ex rel. McCalla v. Burnsville Turnpike Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1884

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Herbert v. SimsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  2. Grantham v. . NunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. Wood v. State ex rel. SeilerIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Mary Price v. Indiana Department of Child Services Director of Indiana Department of Child ServicesIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
  5. City of Auburn v. State ex rel. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API