Legal Opinion

Martin v. Thor Motor Coach Inc

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided September 29, 2021No. 3:20-cv-00013Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION CLARENCE MARTIN et al., Plaintiffs, v. CAUSE NO. 3:20-CV-13 DRL-MGG THOR MOTOR COACH INC., Defendant. OPINION & ORDER The court dismissed this warranty case as untimely based on the original complaint reserving for Clarence and Terri Martin the option to develop a timely cognizable theory under Indiana law that the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act would permit in federal court. On one hand, the amended complaint merely restates the same time-barred warranty claim. The court dismisses this claim once more. On the other…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Brewster McCauley v. City of ChicagCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  4. Geinosky v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  5. Independent Trust Corp. v. Stewart Information Services Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API