Legal Opinion

Railroad Commission v. United States

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 9, 1956No. 10413PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUGHES, Justice.

This is a declaratory judgment proceeding in which the trial court declared the law to be:

“1. That the statutes of the State of Texas, construed in the light of existing Federal law, do not prohibit the United States of America, in the exercise of its constitutional functions, from negotiating and making arrangements for transportation of persons or property for the United States at fares and rates different from those prescribed by the Railroad Commission of Texas.
“2. That the statutes of the State of Texas, construed in the light of existing Federal Law, do not prohibit the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Metcalf & Eddy v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Alabama v. King & BoozerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Panhandle Oil Co. v. Mississippi Ex Rel. KnoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Stanford v. ButlerTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Johnson v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1920

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RoloffTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Tarry Moving & Storage Co. v. Railroad Commission of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  3. Railroad Commission of Texas v. United StatesTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Richard J. Malouf, DDS Richard J, Malouf, DDS, PC And Richard J. Malouf, DDS, PA v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  5. Houston Independent School District v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API