Arnold v. Hilts
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to Denver District Court. Hon. James H. Teller, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey
The plaintiff in error was elected to the office of County-Assessor in November, 1910. Defendant in error was appointed to the municipal office of Assessor on Decemher 14th, 1911, by the mayor, and immediately qualified as such. Plaintiff in error seeks to recover from the defendant in error salary -which was paid the latter as assessor of the City and County of Denver, from December 14th, 1911, until his retirement from office, February 23rd, 1912, alleging and contending that he, and not defendant in error, was during such time the Assessor, and entitled to such salary.
There is no dispute…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People ex rel. Attorney General v. CassidaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
- Stott v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
- People ex rel. Attorney General v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
- Matthews v. Board of SupervisorsMississippi Supreme Court · 1876
- Garfield Township v. CrockerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rath v. LaFonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Hamrick v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- International Brotherhood of Police Officers, Local No. 127 v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
- Drach v. LeckenbySupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
- Roberts v. People Ex Rel. DuncanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.