Legal Opinion

Louisville Cycle & Supply Co., Inc. v. Baach

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1976PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter is before us on a CR 65.07 motion for a temporary injunction. It is being made the subject of an opinion because the chancellor’s reason for denying relief in the trial court goes to the merits of the controversy.

The suit is on a written contract in which the defendant, Baach, agreed “that while he is in the employ of the Company [plaintiff], whether under this contract or any renewal thereof, or under a new contract or substitute contract, and for a period of eighteen months after leaving the service of the Company,” he would not do business in competition with the plaintiff in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Crowell v. WoodruffCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1951

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Maupin v. StansburyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1978
  2. Central Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. Ingram Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1981
  3. Goodman v. Board of Trustees of Community College District 524District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1981
  4. Higdon Food Service, Inc. v. WalkerKentucky Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Senture, llC v. DietrichDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API