Legal Opinion

Central Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. Ingram Associates, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 4, 1981PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUDGEL, Judge.

This is an appeal and cross-appeal from a judgment entered by the Jefferson Circuit Court. The principal issue is whether covenants not to compete, signed by three employees of appellant subsequent to the date of their employment, are valid and enforceable. The court below adjudged that the covenants are unenforceable because they are not supported by consideration.

*683Appellant, Central Adjustment Bureau, Inc. (CAB) is a national company which provides various collection services to clients. The company has offices in twenty-five cities. Although its business is highly competitive,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ceresia v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1951
  2. Thomas v. Coastal Industrial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1959
  3. Hale v. DeatonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1975
  4. Crowell v. WoodruffCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1951
  5. Hook v. HookKentucky Supreme Court · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Central Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. IngramTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Hapney v. Central Garage, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. Managed Health Care Associates, Inc. v. KethanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  4. Harris v. JacksonKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Baker v. ShaperoKentucky Supreme Court · 2006

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API